February Eipr

February’s sparkly number of the EIPR has landed on the IPKat’s doormat. Treats inwards this number are:

*Nicola Isaacs (University of Plymouth) on whether the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland should flake its relative grounds search for the registration of merchandise marks
*Alexander Tsoutsanis (Klos Morel Vos & Schaap) on Art.5(5) of Directive 89/104 together with the absence of a “use inwards commerce” requirement
*Susan Corbett on human rights together with IP protection of databases
*Kirstin Huniar on the resultant of the Enforcement Directive on United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland law
*Li Luo on the legal protection of technological measures inwards China
*Ron Moscona (Clifford Chance) on Newman v Adlem, the sale of goodwill together with the correct to purpose one’s ain name
*Adrian Toutoungi (Linklaters) on EFTA together with the exhaustion of rights
*Carlo Rusconi (OHIM) on the legality of OHIM’s physical care for for notifying decisions past times fax
*Claire Howell (Aston Business School) on Goemar together with genuine use
*Correspondence betwixt John Tessenshohn (Shusaku Yamamoto) together with Yunjoo Lee together with Malcolm Langley (QMIPRI) on employees’ inventions
*The common roundup of mass reviews
*Amanda Maclachlan’s (Allen & Overy) review of United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland statutory instruments inwards force.

says tuck in!