noted by the IPKat on Friday, is directly available report of 26 Jan 2006 on the FT Workshop "Letting larn of intellectual belongings rights?" I cannot but wonder if the writer realizes that both Open Source Software too Wikipedia (and related instances of "IPR-less innovation") practise inwards fact residue upon IP rights—namely copyright.
The fact that i tin conduct a model of licensing over around other does non hateful that IP is non there. Quite to the opposite - it would live on hard to license, or to contract over, a correct yous don't ain inwards the root place; indeed, it would live on quite hard for projects such equally Linux or Wikipedia to thrive, if it weren't for properly enforced too managed belongings rights (although the extent to which participants to these projects are aware of the IP dynamics involved, or are rather motivated too shaped yesteryear a assort of "customary norms", is an opened upwards question).
A improve championship for the article would convey been "Letting larn of absolutistic views on intellectual belongings rights". But inwards this Blue Planet it is obviously easier to convey an absolutistic thought clash amongst around other absolutistic view, rather than trying to argue too empathise where the pump path lies". agrees. Merpel adds, Andrea’s correct most the clash of absolutist views—just await at the so-called struggle over the European Union’s proposed Computer Implemented Inventions end year.
Journal of Intellectual Property RightsIPKat co-blogmeister received this message from Mrs Madhu Sahni:
“You volition live on glad to know that our institute, a element unit of measurement of the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, Govt of India, is publishing a bimonthly IPR journal entitled Journal of Intellectual Property Rights to serve the professionals treatment IPR issues, scientists, technologists, too managers of R&D institutions too industry. It equally good caters the needs of all those interested inwards IPR matter, including academicians, policy makers too managers inwards S&T departments/agencies too industries. It is a peer-reviewed journal.
The Journal,the alone i of its variety inwards India, has completed its 10 years of publication inwards 2005. It publishes contributed/invited articles, instance studies too patent reviews; technical notes on electrical flow IPR issues; literature review Blue Planet literature on IPR; national too international IPR news, mass reviews, too conference reports. Besides contents too abstracts amount text of the papers is equally good available on our website www.niscair.res.in.
The magazine has a broad circulation amidst the growing intellectual belongings community inwards Republic of Republic of India equally good equally inwards other countries".
wants to clarify that this magazine is unconnected to Oxford University's Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, despite their near-identical titles. Merpel adds, the Indian publication has been going since 1996. Oxford's started 2 years later. Do yous mean value they'll sue?
More Anglo-Indian intellectual belongings confusion: EIPR (left) v EIPR (right)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar