has live on come upwards to grips alongside a
decision yesteryear Richard Arnold QC (sitting inwards his capacity of Lord Chancellor’s Appointed Person) that is a “must-read” for all those who are involved or interested inwards the legal aspects of merchandising.
Poster poser
The stone band
Linkin Park applied to register the words LINKIN PARK equally a merchandise grade inwards the U.K. inwards Class sixteen for printed matter, posters together with books. During the exam the examiner took objection to the grade nether ss 3(1)(b) together with (c) of the Trade Marks Act 1994. No bear witness of acquired distinctive grapheme was produced. These objections were upheld yesteryear the hearing office. Linkin Park appealed to the LCAP, who dismissed the appeal. Here are the highlights:
* Although passing off was non raised yesteryear Linkin Park’s merchandise grade attorney, it was appropriate to refer to recent developments inwards the police clit of passing off. Following
Irvine v Talksport, the U.K. seat is that a performer whose scream and/or likeness is used inwards is used inwards merchandising, advertising or other commercial activities inwards such a mode equally to propose that he or she has licensed or endorsed those activities opposite to the fact is probable to select a remedy inwards passing off. However, the performer has no remedy inwards passing off if his or her scream or likeness is used inwards mode which does non mislead members of the world into believing that he or she has licensed or endorsed the use. This brings the police clit inwards the U.K. into line of piece of occupation alongside the police clit inwards Australia, equally stated inwards
Henderson v Radio Corporation.
* Although the give-and-take LINKIN together with the phrase LINKIN PARK were invented yesteryear the grouping together with were meaningless at the betoken at which they were coined yesteryear the group, it is the pregnant of the grade at the application appointment that is decisive. At the application date, this grade was no longer meaningless. Instead it denoted the group. Even though this did non brand LINKIN PARK a lexicon term, it is clear from the ECJ that signs involve non live lexicon damage inwards guild to live considered descriptive. This did non though pose the grouping inwards a worse seat 1 time it was well-known.
* It was non the example that, inwards guild to live a feature of the goods, the thing denoted yesteryear the sign has to live a measurable holding of goods rather than data content of the goods. In fact, the data content is a critical feature of many goods, peculiarly calculator programs.
* In guild to autumn inside s.3(1)(c), the sign does non select to autumn inside 1 of the types described inwards that section.
* The fact that in that location was no ameliorate agency of describing a poster of the grouping than equally “a LINKIN PARK” poster hateful that the application of s.3(1)(c) could non live avoided. H5N1 consumer who wanted to inquire a store assistant whether the store stocked posters depicting the grouping would most probable inquire “Do y'all select whatever LINKIN PARK posters?” In this question, the applied for grade was clearly existence used to depict a feature of the goods existence sought, namely their discipline matter.
* It would live impossible for those wishing to merchandise inwards posters of the grouping to marketplace seat their products without using the LINKIN PARK mark. The grouping could non live denoted inwards whatever other agency (such equally their image).
* Linkin Park’s declaration that performers should live able to halt the role of their names without consent inwards relation to whatever goods or services without exception was without authority.
* As the police clit before long stands, the starting betoken of whatever consideration of the distinctiveness together with therefore descriptiveness of a grade is the essential component subdivision of a merchandise mark, which is basically to announce the rootage of the goods. The scream of a performer, similar the scream of an author, undoubtedly identifies the rootage of the functioning or work. However, it does non follow that the scream of the performer or writer acts equally an indication of the merchandise rootage of a production (e.g. a CD, majority or MP3 file) which embodies the functioning or work. Even where the functioning or operate is protected yesteryear copyright or performers’ rights, consumers are aware of the existence of unauthorised reproductions. Where consumers select obtained unauthorised copies of performances or works, the scream of the performer continues to accurately designate a feature of the music track, namely the rootage of the performance, fifty-fifty though the consumer has infringed diverse IP rights together with the consumer volition in all probability live aware that he has committed an infringing act. Moreover, copyright together with performers’ rights are of finite duration. Once the rights select expired, the writer tin dismiss no longer command the operate together with and so the author’s scream cannot component subdivision on a merchandise grade fifty-fifty on the Earth that his consent is required for the operate to live reproduced together with distributed..
* Whether the world volition await the goods to live authorised volition depend on the types of goods inwards question, exactly no clear line of piece of occupation tin dismiss live drawn on the Earth of roughly goods existence “media” together with others existence “mere icon carriers”.
* The copyright seat was at odds alongside the suggestion that consumers would await merchandise pertaining to the grouping to live authorised yesteryear the group. The outset possessor of copyright inwards photographs of the grouping would live the lensman or his employer together with and so the photographs would live exploitable without the group’s consent.
* Even if the authors’ names were registered for CDs together with books because of consumer expectation near authorization, that would non hateful that the grade was registrable for posters. In together with so far equally applicants rely on consumer expectations near authorization, it is for the applicants to present bear witness of these expectations.
* Comments on the condition of
Arsenal v Reed (at all levels), the Scottish example of
Bravado v Mainstream and
R v Johnstone were also made.
notes that this example appears to severely limit, together with mayhap eliminate, the mightiness of musicians to attain registration inwards the U.K. of marks to live used on their merchandise. Their mightiness to attain registration for recordings of their performances also appears to live threatened. Merpel wonders why the LCAP prefaced his determination alongside comments on passing off, fifty-fifty though this crusade of activeness was non raised yesteryear Linkin Park. She suspects that the LCAP may select been reassuring performers that, fifty-fifty though their mightiness to obtain merchandise grade registrations for merchandise together with fifty-fifty records has been cutting to the quick, the tin dismiss nonetheless protect themselves yesteryear recourse to unregistered merchandise grade law.
Lincoln Park
hereLinking parks
here
