here by the IPKat);
* "X-Tended Use of UDRP", yesteryear ii to a greater extent than of the IPKat's friends, Miguel O'Farrell as well as Mencahem Kaplan (Marval, O'Farrell & Mairal, Argentina), on how domain advert dispute guidelines are beingness employed inwards Argentine courts;
* "When Systems Collide" yesteryear Ana Lucia de Sousa Borda (Dannemann Siemsen Bigler & Ipanema Moreira), reviewing the yesteryear as well as introduce systems for dealing amongst famous marks inwards Brazil.

With an near unbelievable surge of speed as well as efficiency Sweet & Maxwell produced the March 2006 resultant of the European Trade Mark Reports before Feb is fifty-fifty one-half agency through. This resultant carries 8 cases, including the next which are reported inwards English linguistic communication for the kickoff time:
* Maserati SpA v Stilma SpA as well as others (Bologna Court of Appeal, Italy): a curious dispute involving revocation of a co-owned merchandise score on the footing that i of the co-owners had non used it;As usual, if at that topographic point are whatever cases you'd similar to encounter reported inwards the ETMR, drib the IPKat a describe here and permit him know. He'll encounter what he tin do.
* Ath. Skyfas-Emm. Papoulias v Greece, Emmanuel Savaides-Manolarakis (Athens Administrative Court of Appeal): whether application to register a sign containing the advert of a somebody formerly involved inwards a work concern is an act of bad faith;
* Ath. Skyfas-Emm. Papoulias v Greece, Emmanuel Savaides-Manolarakis (Athens Administrative Court of Appeal): whether personality rights of a dead somebody were infringed yesteryear an application to register his advert every bit a merchandise mark.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar