In an article inward the New York Times reminiscent of certainly parts of Naomi Klein’s No Logo (tie-in website here), Alissa Quart (reviews of her Branded hither and here) has slammed the encroachment of brands into pretty much every expression of schoolhouse life inward the United States. The trial has been brought into focus past times the determination of certainly schoolhouse boards to ban junk foods from vending machines inward the schoolhouse grounds because of the link betwixt such foods as well as teenage obesity. Quart goes 1 further, argument that the pupils “soak up” the branding on such products. However, this is exclusively the tip of the iceberg, amongst sponsorship taking many forms, including advertising inward corridors, educational materials sponsored past times companies, plain trips to shopping centres as well as Channel One a schoolhouse telly network that shows advertising.
For example, Quart reports:
“One teenager from Texas who attends a schoolhouse sponsored past times a soda fellowship lately told me that she was non allowed to gulp other sodas inward schoolhouse as well as and thus was coerced into roofing her textbooks amongst newspaper bearing the logo as well as the icon of that build of soda.”
Should IP lawyers experience guilty? Well, at to the lowest degree a little. The branding gets into schools through sponsorship deals as well as mortal has to draw upwards those deals. Also, the tangible symbol of the build ideals that are beingness foisted on to schoolchildren is our proficient friend the merchandise score -- exactly delight experience gratis to differ…
Channel One, the US TV network for schools here.
Field Trip Factory, which sends children on plain trips to the shops of its corporate sponsors here.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar