BoingBoing of the move of a French artist, Pierre Pinoncelli, who final Midweek took a pocket-sized hammer to Marcel Duchamp’s “Fountain” urinal, which was on display at the Pompidou Centre. M. Pinoncelli is said to convey claimed that his actions were themselves a move of art, in addition to a tribute to Duchamp, in addition to others of the Dadaist movement. On a previous occasion he urinated into the urinal acre it was on display inwards Nimmes.
inwards a minute of idle speculation wonders how, if at all, Pinoncelli’s move would survive protected past times copyright. Has he added to the sculpture to an extent that would survive counted equally an master copy artistic work? Or would his move survive ameliorate classified equally a performance? If the latter is true, Merpel suspects that his Nimmes surgical physical care for wouldn’t survive protected on describe of piece of employment organisation human relationship of it beingness immoral.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar