The Jan 2006 lawsuit of JIPLP, the Journal of Intellectual Property Law together with Practice (published yesteryear Oxford University Press) has to a greater extent than or less pretty challenging materials inwards it. For illustration
* Toshiko Takenaka (CASRIP, University of Washington) contrasts the United States of America of America doctrine of patent claim structure alongside its Great Britain counterpart together with makes to a greater extent than or less abrupt observations;IPKat co-blogmeister Jeremy, who edits JIPLP, is e'er anxious for feedback together with exciting ideas for futurity features. If there's anything you'd similar to tell him, delight electronic mail him here.
* Abida Chaudri (Bristows) examines the contents of the London Olympics Bill, which makes grim reading for honest traders too every bit dishonest ones;
* Susie Middlemiss together with Steven Warner (Slaughter together with May) nation that Lord Justice Aldous' intriguing dicta inwards Arsenal v Reed indicate a sentiment of passing off every bit developing a doctrine of dilution; Chris Wadlow (University of East Anglia) says they're incorrect - he's talking of a restitutionary remedy to curb unjust enrichment;
* Russell Falconer (Baker Botts) explains the terra firma of the Washington Redskins case, where merchandise grade constabulary together with political correctness collide.
Contents of this lawsuit here
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar