Why, when the yr is 2005, does the IPKat have book 6, upshot 6, for 2003-2004 of a well-regarded legal magazine inwards the plain of IP? The response is that this is Lawtext's BioScience Law Review, which adopts an unconventional, idiosyncratic calendar of its ain which is designed to (i) baffle the taxation man, (ii) confuse contributors as well as readers alike amongst its anachronism as well as (iii) violate everything that well-ordered folk similar police librarians concord sacred. Anyway, the yr is 2005, the book is 2003-4 as well as the BioSLR goes its ain sweetness way. If it wasn't for the high character of the content, says the IPKat, he thinks he'd catterwaul.
This is what it looks similar ...
Interesting content inwards this upshot includes the following:
* Cambridge University lecturer Kathleen Liddell writes on the mythical connector betwixt information protection as well as confidentiality (always prissy to run across pop myths debunked);
* Nigel Jones (Linklaters) as well as David Marsh (Arnold & Porter) contrast Great Britain as well as U.S.A. approaches to the doctrine of equivalents inwards patent law.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar